Talk:1 4 1 Issues

From World Wind Wiki

Revision as of 03:04, 3 August 2009 (edit) Ammianus (Talk | contribs) (New page: == Priority column (H,M,L)== The Priority column currently has classifications of High, Medium Low. I intended to imply that High were things that were definite defects with high impacts....) ← Previous diff		Current revision (03:07, 3 August 2009) (edit) (undo) Ammianus (Talk | contribs) m
Line 1:		Line 1:
-
	== Priority column (H,M,L)==		== Priority column (H,M,L)==
-	The Priority column currently has classifications of High, Medium Low. I intended to imply that High were things that were definite defects with high impacts. Medium may be defects without high impacts or important enhancements to be considered. Low would probably be for low impact defects or enhancements with less importance. These are my initial proposals for prioritizing work, since I added much of the original data I'll make sure I stick to this convention, but for some issues I personally don't have the context to give good priorities.[[User:Ammianus|Ammianus]] 03:04, 3 August 2009 (UTC)	+	The Priority column currently has classifications of High, Medium Low. I intended to imply that High were things that were definite defects with high impacts. Medium may be defects without high impacts or important enhancements to be considered. Low would be for low or unknown impact defects or enhancements with less importance. These are my initial proposals for prioritizing work, we could add other categories (e.g. critical), or other scales to measure our priority as in separate out enhancements from defects, or have an "impact" field. [[User:Ammianus|Ammianus]] 03:04, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

---

Current revision

[edit] Priority column (H,M,L)

The Priority column currently has classifications of High, Medium Low. I intended to imply that High were things that were definite defects with high impacts. Medium may be defects without high impacts or important enhancements to be considered. Low would be for low or unknown impact defects or enhancements with less importance. These are my initial proposals for prioritizing work, we could add other categories (e.g. critical), or other scales to measure our priority as in separate out enhancements from defects, or have an "impact" field. Ammianus 03:04, 3 August 2009 (UTC)